When the conditions are ripe for a total takeover
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton just announced that the Obama Administration would be working hand in glove with the UN to pass a new Small Arms Treaty designed to register, ban and confiscate firearms owned by private citizens. This is nothing more than a massive, global gun control scheme. Next step is to weaken the military, shrink down the police force, and allow groups such as ACORN, Black Panthers and union thugs with baseball bats, led by Andy Stern, control the outcomes of elections, food distributions and managing chaos. When there are more people on welfare rolls than taxpayers, and those who keep getting extended unemployment checks without having to work than those who work two to three jobs to survive, the conditions will be ripe for a total takeover. And that’s how they intend to do it. Just ask Van Jones.
Cybercorrespondent
- Cybercorrespondent's blog
- Login or register to post comments
So, you are saying you want
So, you are saying you want them terrorists to have guns, lots and lots of guns? And what the world needs now is lots and lots of small arms. What about rpgs? They are small arms. Are you fighting for the terrorists right to own, buy, and sell rpgs?
And some kind of subtext about watch out for them black folks, they want to take away your rights to put down them black folks? And more subtext about being afraid.
ACORN blah blah Black Panthers blah blah, somebody else who is probably black blah blah.
I guess those brooklyn cops must be ACORN lovers, eh? Cuz they cleared those black folks and said those two who made the ACORN sting tapes edited out the parts in which the acorn workers refused to go along with their con. Those two were a couple of fakers who took you teabaggers for all your money to get their 15 minutes of fame.
Hey, wait a minute, what about black panthers with guns? Do they get to keep theirs?
ACORN blah blah Black Panthers blah blah
“Hey, wait a minute, what about black panthers with guns? Do they get to keep theirs?” Answer to your question- all criminals get to hide and use them. Only the honest white, black and whatever other color you want to throw in the mix don’t. I’m sure you fully support the actions of the two Black Panther members in the first video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU<?xml:namespace prefix = o />
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NmaZIdz6Vo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ohp5IX3y098
So you are completely ignorant of the history
I'm no expert on the black panthers, but what my memory is telling me is, they started as a group promoting the legal ownership of guns by black people to protect themselves from the violence of white people, under the model of the second amendment. Back in the 60s this was terribly provacative.
And dude, if there is one thing that video culture and youtube have taught us, it's that video can be used to deceive just as easily as it can be used to illustrate. So, lets see your reasoned analysis, with followup commentary from other reliable sources, of whatever it is those videos show.
Surely the republicans must have invested energy in investigation. So let's see the result. Interfering with elections is a crime. Who went to jail. Let's see the police report.
Because your side uses black agitprop and evil tactics all the time - for instance, you just made the unsupported black propaganda claim that blank panthers are criminals, which, even in the WORST POSSIBLE CASE scenario is false. They are no more criminals than all teabaggers are criminals because a few of you have shot police, like that fellow in pittsburgh.
And it's typical of your side to avoid the real issue
I noticed you avoided my first question, which was the serious one. (You got all riled up by the thought of black people owning guns instead.)
If Clinton as secretary of state is trying to negotiate a small arms treaty with other countries, that means she is trying to keep small arms out of the hands of terrorists.
Why are you opposed to that?